Powered by Invision Power Board


Pages: (2) [1] 2   ( Go to first unread post ) Closed TopicStart new topicStart Poll

> Debate: US Patent Support Act, Until 11 December
weekendwarrior
Posted: Nov 18 2004, 03:58 PM
Quote Post


Speaker (The Legalist)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1475
Member No.: 147
Joined: 21-August 04



Mr. Laverone, of California, Mr. Schmidt, Ms. Wood, Mr. Mers, Mr. Heortman, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Cloe, Mr. Wisniewski, Mr. Mondragon, Mr. Garwood, Mr. keiffer, and Mr. Forsyth submit to the House Committee on Appropriations

A BILL

To provide funding to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the purpose of speeding up the processing of pending patents.

Be it encated by the President of the United States and both houses of Congress assembled.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE

THis bill may be referred to as the "US Patent Support Act"

SECTION 2. FINDINGS

The Congress finds that,

1. The economy of the United States of America is primarily driven by the development of new products

2. Patents issued by the United States provide a necessary protection for intellectual property, and help encourage research and development.

3. The United States Patent and Trademark Office has more than five-hundred-thousand (500,000) patent applications awaiting processing, and that this number is expected to continue growing.

4. The United States Patent and Trademark Office expects the wait period for patent approval to extend to as much as five (5) years.

5. This problem can be traced to bugetary deficentcies and a lack of clerks to process the applications.

6. As much as $650 million collected in User Fees paid by patent applicants is used to fund programs unrelated to the USPTO in any way, shape, or form.

SECTION 3. DEFINITONS

1. USER FEE is defined as a surcharge payed by patent applicants to the USPTO upon filing of a new patent.

SECTION 4. USE OF USER FEES BY THE GOVERNMENT

The User Fees charged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office shall be used soley for the purposes of paying off expenses incurred by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Upon encatment of this bill, the federal govenrment is expressly prohibited from using revenue derived from said User Fees to pay expenses incurred by programs not related to the United States Patent and Trademark Office.

Upon enactment, the USPTO shall submit to the Congress an annual report containing reccomendations for the size of the fees to be payed by patent applicants. Thses reccomendations shall go into effect upon approval of Congress.

SECTION 5. ENACTMENT

This bill, upon approval by the President of the United States and both houses of the Congress of the United States, shall go into effect March 1, 2005.

PMEmail PosterAOL
Top
Viper NASCAR
Posted: Nov 19 2004, 06:20 AM
Quote Post


Unconventional Warfare
****

Group: Admin
Posts: 1016
Member No.: 366
Joined: 14-November 04



Mr. Speaker,

I STRONGLY support this bill which will provide funding to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. It is ridiculous for an inventor to have to wait for five years to have their inventions patented. Adequate funding will hopefully speed up the patent processing. That being said, I urge my fellow congressmen to vote favorably on it as well.
PMUsers Website
Top
Fayul
Posted: Nov 19 2004, 01:07 PM
Quote Post


Master Snuggle Wumpkins, I need your soft, absorbent advice!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Member No.: 325
Joined: 31-October 04



Mr. Speaker,

I agree strongly with my fellow representative. This bill will greatly increase the efficency of the US patent office while having little effect on the economy. As such, I hope all of us may vote favorably on it.
PMEmail PosterAOL
Top
Joe Cienciolo
Posted: Nov 19 2004, 03:55 PM
Quote Post


The Man Who Paved Paradise To Put Up A Parking Lot
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1103
Member No.: 95
Joined: 20-August 04



Mr. Speaker,

I join my colleagues across in support of this bill. I urge that this body pass it.

I Yield.
PMEmail Poster
Top
Pro-Union Republican
Posted: Nov 19 2004, 08:15 PM
Quote Post


Socially Conservative Third Wayer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2364
Member No.: 196
Joined: 3-September 04



Mr. Speaker,

I motion for unanimous consent.

I yield.
PMEmail PosterAOL
Top
Leif Roberts
Posted: Nov 19 2004, 09:36 PM
Quote Post


Moving to Canada
**

Group: Members
Posts: 171
Member No.: 311
Joined: 23-October 04



Mr. Speaker,

I second the motion for uc.

I yield.
PMEmail PosterMSN
Top
Fayul
Posted: Nov 19 2004, 10:28 PM
Quote Post


Master Snuggle Wumpkins, I need your soft, absorbent advice!
***

Group: Members
Posts: 404
Member No.: 325
Joined: 31-October 04



Mr. Speaker,

I also second the motion for Unanimous consent.

I yield.
PMEmail PosterAOL
Top
tompea
Posted: Nov 20 2004, 04:47 PM
Quote Post


Safe Incumbent
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1404
Member No.: 317
Joined: 28-October 04



Mr. SPT,
The motion for UC has been numerously seconded, I nevertheless am compelled to go on record in support of this basic common sense approach to patent administration.

The UC, and the nature of this bill are a good opportunity to move expeditiously, and devote time in this body to more thorny issues that lack the clarity of the present case.

I yield
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
bcarlson33
Posted: Nov 20 2004, 05:51 PM
Quote Post


Squeaky clean like a rubber duckie
******

Group: Admin
Posts: 7841
Member No.: 1
Joined: 18-August 04



Mr. Speaker,

First, as we all should know by now, there is no need to second a motion for unanimous consent.

Second, I object to the call for unanimous consent. I object because this bill does not do what it says it should. A technical requirement about budget line items is not going to speed up the backlog at the patent office. But I have an amendment that will.

I move to amend the bill as follows:

To replace the following:

QUOTE
The User Fees charged by the United States Patent and Trademark Office shall be used soley for the purposes of paying off expenses incurred by the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Upon encatment of this bill, the federal govenrment is expressly prohibited from using revenue derived from said User Fees to pay expenses incurred by programs not related to the United States Patent and Trademark Office.


with the following:

QUOTE
The sum of $200,000,000 shall be appropriated to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, of which:

$100,000,000 shall be used to hire additional personnel and purchase additional equipment to process the backlog of applications, so that the average wait time for an application to be processed is reduced by 50% in the next five years;

$85,000,000 shall be used to expedite the USPTO's transition from a purely paper-based operation to a primarily electronic, paperless one;

$15,000,000 shall be used to conduct a comprehensive efficiency review of USPTO practices and procedures.
PMEmail PosterUsers WebsiteAOL
Top
Mick Peruzza
Posted: Nov 20 2004, 06:19 PM
Quote Post


Safe Incumbent
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1292
Member No.: 323
Joined: 29-October 04



Mr Speaker

I 2nd and yield
PM
Top
weekendwarrior
Posted: Dec 8 2004, 06:04 PM
Quote Post


Speaker (The Legalist)
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1475
Member No.: 147
Joined: 21-August 04



The following amendment has been passed

the original bill

QUOTE
SECTION 4. USE OF USER FEES BY THE GOVERNMENT
The sum of $200,000,000 shall be appropriated to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, of which:

$100,000,000 shall be used to hire additional personnel and purchase additional equipment to process the backlog of applications, so that the average wait time for an application to be processed is reduced by 50% in the next five years;

$850,000,000 shall be used to expedite the USPTO's transition from a purely paper-based operation to a primarily electronic, paperless one;

$150,000,000 shall be used to conduct a comprehensive efficiency review of USPTO practices and procedures.
Upon enactment, the USPTO shall submit to the Congress an annual report containing reccomendations for the size of the fees to be payed by patent applicants. Thses reccomendations shall go into effect upon approval of Congress



the proposed amendment

QUOTE
SECTION 4. USE OF USER FEES BY THE GOVERNMENT
The sum of $1,100,000.00 shall be appropriated to the United States Patent and Trademark Office, of which:

$100,000 shall be used to hire additional personnel and purchase additional equipment to process the backlog of applications, so that the average wait time for an application to be processed is reduced by 50% in the next five years;

$850,000 shall be used to expedite the USPTO's transition from a purely paper-based operation to a primarily electronic, paperless one;

$150,000 shall be used to conduct a comprehensive efficiency review of USPTO practices and procedures.
Upon enactment, the USPTO shall submit to the Congress an annual report containing reccomendations for the size of the fees to be payed by patent applicants. Thses reccomendations shall go into effect upon approval of Congress.


PMEmail PosterAOL
Top
Crysnia
Posted: Dec 10 2004, 06:30 PM
Quote Post


Estne volumen in toga, an solum tibi libet me videre?
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1263
Member No.: 211
Joined: 9-September 04



Mr. Speaker,

Now that the amendment has fixed the previously mentioned problem, I move for Unanimous Consent.

I yield.
PMEmail PosterAOLMSN
Top
Pro-Union Republican
Posted: Dec 10 2004, 08:31 PM
Quote Post


Socially Conservative Third Wayer
****

Group: Members
Posts: 2364
Member No.: 196
Joined: 3-September 04



Mr. Speaker,

I second the motion for UC.

I yield.
PMEmail PosterAOL
Top
jayrmckenzie
Posted: Dec 10 2004, 09:30 PM
Quote Post


Titleholder
**

Group: Members
Posts: 103
Member No.: 386
Joined: 3-December 04



Mr. Speaker,

I object to the unanimous consent motion. I believe that this House should be allocating funds to higher priorities. I doubt that increasing the funding for the Patient and Trademark Office will speed up the process. There are reasons that the process is lengthy, it is a comprehensive process. The government must balance speed with responsibility. Despite this I simply believe the legislation is a poor allocation of funds that should be spent in other areas of a higher priority. Americans are concerned with funding education and social security. Let us make this our priority and stop wasteful spending that is unlikely to achieve results. I urge the members of this House to vote no.

I yield.
PMEmail Poster
Top
tompea
Posted: Dec 10 2004, 11:46 PM
Quote Post


Safe Incumbent
****

Group: Members
Posts: 1404
Member No.: 317
Joined: 28-October 04



Mr Speaker,
Just checking here, but does the gentleman from Minnesota realize we are talking about 1.1 million dollars here?

I yield.
PMEmail PosterUsers Website
Top
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

Topic Options Pages: (2) [1] 2  Closed TopicStart new topicStart Poll

 



[ Script Execution time: 0.7389 ]   [ 16 queries used ]   [ GZIP Enabled ]

Provided by Forum For Free - setup your very own free message board now!